Comments for Legal Hold Pro

Comment on Rimkus v. Cammarata: Another Great Reason Organizations Need an Effective Legal Hold Process by The Sedona Conference Publishes Updated Legal Hold Commentary « Legal Hold Pro

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:26:32 +0000

[...] It reflects evolving trends toward the consideration of proportionality, as illustrated by the Rimkus opinion, when considering the scope of preservation efforts (e.g., accessibility, probative value [...]

Comment on Northern District of Illinois Makes Its Own Way with Opinion Echoing Need for Strong Legal Holds by Victor Stanley II: Judge Grimm’s Review of the State of Preservation « Legal Hold Pro

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:38:57 +0000

[...] On Thursday, September 9, 2010, Judge Paul Grimm of the U.S. Fourth Circuit (D.MD) continuedthe 2010 tradition of huge opinions with his 89-pager about the ongoing spoliation saga in Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., et al. (D.MD, Sept. 9, 2010). Craig Ball was the first to get the word out about Judge Grimm’s opinion the day after it was issued and this is another blockbuster coming on the heels of Pension Committee, Rimkus and Jones v. Bremen H.S. [...]

Comment on Rimkus v. Cammarata: Another Great Reason Organizations Need an Effective Legal Hold Process by Victor Stanley II: Judge Grimm’s Review of the State of Preservation « Legal Hold Pro

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:38:54 +0000

[...] day after it was issued and this is another blockbuster coming on the heels of Pension Committee, Rimkus and Jones v. Bremen [...]

Comment on Just Published! An in-depth analysis of Judge Scheindlin’s Pension Committee Opinion by Victor Stanley II: Judge Grimm’s Review of the State of Preservation « Legal Hold Pro

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:38:49 +0000

[...] opinion the day after it was issued and this is another blockbuster coming on the heels of Pension Committee, Rimkus and Jones v. Bremen [...]

Comment on “The Enlightened Legal Hold” by Brad Harris and Craig Ball Is Published Today! by Valorie Anderson-Branch

Valorie Anderson-Branch — Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:48:52 +0000

Great information! Thank you.

Comment on Rimkus v. Cammarata: Another Great Reason Organizations Need an Effective Legal Hold Process by Trendspotting in Legal Holds, Part 1 – Gibson Dunn Mid-Year E-Discovery Update « Legal Hold Pro

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:02:38 +0000

[...] “Reflecting the maturation of e-discovery law, courts this year have stated that, going forward, what is reasonable will be judged instead according to ‘clearly established applicable standards.’” (Rimkus v. Cammarata) [...]

Comment on Northern District of Illinois Makes Its Own Way with Opinion Echoing Need for Strong Legal Holds by Trendspotting in Legal Holds, Part 1 – Gibson Dunn Mid-Year E-Discovery Update « Legal Hold Pro

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:02:36 +0000

[...] counsel to ensure that preservation measures are effectively implemented.” (Pension Committee, Jones v. Bremen H.S., John B. v. Goetz, No. 3:98-0168, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8821, at *85 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 28, [...]

Comment on ‘Small Corporation’ Gets $10,000 Sanction for Spoliation Resulting from Lack of Written Hold by Trendspotting in Legal Holds, Part 1 – Gibson Dunn Mid-Year E-Discovery Update « Legal Hold Pro

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:02:27 +0000

[...] Legal Hold Pro « ‘Small Corporation’ Gets $10,000 Sanction for Spoliation Resulting from Lack of Written&… [...]

Comment on Second Verse Same as the First: Failure to Issue a Legal Hold is Gross Negligence by Trendspotting in Legal Holds, Part 1 – Gibson Dunn Mid-Year E-Discovery Update « Legal Hold Pro

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:02:19 +0000

[...] “The 2010 opinions addressing the preservation of electronic evidence continued to emphasize that the duty to preserve ESI may be triggered before the filing of a complaint.” (Pension Committee, Crown Castle v. Nudd) [...]

Comment on Just Published! An in-depth analysis of Judge Scheindlin’s Pension Committee Opinion by Trendspotting in Legal Holds, Part 1 – Gibson Dunn E-Discovery Update « Legal Hold Pro

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:02:11 +0000

[...] emphasize that the duty to preserve ESI may be triggered before the filing of a complaint.” (Pension Committee, Crown Castle v. [...]